Meanwhile, despite an initial stunned response, a good number of broadband internet industry experts in the United Kingdom has started thinking that China’s act of manipulating a veiled attack on the search giant, alongside its hidden agenda of promoting its own alternative for Google; Baidu. Particularly for one main reason that the search engine could be eying a position of monopoly in the internet world, which could be potentially perilous for numerous small and medium firms that depended on the segment.

Back to the controversy, the search giant had gone public to reveal further that – even while not directly accusing the state’s communist government – it had along with Adobe traced the cyber-invasion back to a source, which enjoyed links with the government of China. Nonetheless, the crucial declaration from Google came next that it would no longer censor internet content in China. This declaration was made by the search firm citing the malice displayed by the same hostile source in hacking the Gmail accounts of the activists for human rights in China.

It is history that following the involvement of the United States State Department in the issue, China invited the search giant to resolve the problem through legal means within China. Something important here is that although China has downplayed the dispute with a view to defuse the intensity of the situation, it has also expressed its point that it did not care about the decision of Google whether to stay or quit.

Now looking at it from a different angle, one can see that the much anticipated web domination of the future world, Google has declared that it would stop the support for rival browsers such as Firefox 2.0, Microsoft Internet Explorer version 6.0 and Safari 2.0, conspicuously to promote its upcoming Chrome operating system. Now, many users of internet will not complain against going along an exclusive Google internet line that packs a Google OS, browser and search engine, especially if it can provide that vital security that has been the nemesis of Microsoft’s IE.

The justice minister of Germany Sabine Leuthesusser-Schnarrenberger’s strong statement made some days back that Google was fast emerging as a giant monopoly that could be facing legal procedures aimed at turning it more transparent can be well read along with the Chinese attempts of late. The German minister’s concern that the search giant was accruing too much power and information over citizens, also reflect those of many British broadband internet experts.

Today, with Google seeming most likely to pull out of the communist state, it is left for the history to say if this major opportunity for Microsoft’s Bing and Yahoo to larger shares of the colossal search market, and through which considerably allay the increasing concerns regarding a brewing monopoly.

Cartoon Credit: Cage Cartoon

Would you believe it that the president of the most virulent capitalist state in the world was given an opportunity to address a gathering of university students in the city of Shanghai by the government of a country that is renowned as one of the last bastions of Socialism. And more surprise in store to know the subject of his speech – human rights. Nevertheless, the Obama juggernaut rolled on as he unfolded his message, so delicately balanced, as broad as broadband internet, “I think the stronger becomes the society as more freely the information flows, for the citizens of the countries across the world can then hold their governments accountable.”

Apart from the verbalization by Obama attempting to encourage a misdirected and excessively subservient population to conceive the essence of human rights, everything that happened there bore an air of apprehensiveness, if it was to be given in an honest vein. Take the reports of the various newspapers, which mentioned a subtle message being apparent in the words of Obama that unless the only superpower in the world and its rising challenger worked hand in hand few challenges faced by the world could be solved. However, given the historical facts anyone with a decently healthy psyche can predict that China’s would be the last government in the world to enjoy the statement of the American president that he was one of the biggest supporters of non-censorship.

Of course, Hu Jintao’s China is no Stalin’s Russia, ruthless Deng Xiaoping must be no more as well, but still seldom are they unaware of the fact that there do still exist in the red state the remnants of the bloody massacre of Tianenmen Square that took place in the late 80s. And seldom would they forget that the tens of thousands of youngsters that flocked at the place then to meet with their destiny had come there to importune for the permission to exercise their rights. For everyone across the world, but the regime of Xiaoping, they were obviously humans. According to Chuck Doherty, the broadband specialist at Broadband Suppliers, fortunate were the rest of the people around the world at the time, for not having largely exposed to the internet; because it would had been a burden then seeing the live clippings of the bloody carnage and topping that up by sitting helpless.

“Anyway full marks to Barack for telling them that – although he was saying this as part of his addressing the students, the message was well hurled at the leadership of China – they in the United States considered it a source of strength for having unrestricted or free internet access, which he thought should be encouraged as well. His message was full of implications that even if evaded by the Communist leaders feigning ignorance, was certain to go right down the hearts of the millions of commoners – lovingly called proletariat even in a socialist people’s republic – languishing there under the ‘most charitable’ eyes of the ever-greedy bureaucrats and politicians”, said Doherty.

Doherty added, “One of my Chinese acquaintances, now settled in Oklahoma City, an ardent fan of Wayne Rooney and the quad-play broadband TV phone mobile bundle packages of the UK, once gave it rightly and candidly that he was fed up of the so called communist politicians straddling his homeland like parasites, sucking the fluids out of the fatigued trunks of peasants and industrial labourers that toiled for the country relentlessly to give it the status that it enjoyed at present. Nonetheless, he was full of hope that some time in the future the system would change for goodness’ sake.” “Meanwhile, I personally think that Barack looked a bit too much diplomatic as he not only refused to acknowledge the Dalai Lama, apparently to placate the communist giant, but also swallowed the fact that the internet sector of China posed a grave threat to the rest of the countries’ cyber-systems by spawning out an astronomical load of viruses and worms from its arsenal”, lamented Doherty.

Indeed it is a point that simply having the back-up of the most advanced broadband/mobile broadband technologies that gives fast outputs regarding data transfers and bandwidths would seldom amount to reaching the goal, unless the service is provided in an unrestricted manner. Comparing with the broadband internet scenario in the UK where people are free to express their will against some uncalled for services such as monitoring their internet ventures using the ISPs or even proposing certain legislation to disconnect the service of the persistent file-sharers, the broadband using public of China can be rightly termed as a dumb lot given to unmanly submission, simply for the reason that it has lost that character of protesting against subjugation. And if it is their trait then it is high time it has been said, “There exists no genuine broadband user, but state financed hackers and hijackers in China.”